Do You Know What a Book Publicist Does?

do you know what a book publicist does claire mckinneyDo you know what a book publicist does?

At lunch with publicist friends, there’s one question that we always seem to come back to: does anyone in this business know what we actually do? Yes, yes, every author says they “want” a publicist, but how many authors, and those who work in publishing, actually understand what a publicist does and, more importantly, what can reasonably be expected from their publicity campaign?

People in this business still assume that the only good thing a publicist does is book appearances on Oprah or The Today Show or Good Morning America. Even though this circuit is outdated—Oprah’s show is off the air, GMA is closing in on the Today show’s ratings, and The Early Show just went through another reorganization—people in publishing still think these are the rounds a publicist makes. This needs to change.

I came into the publishing industry accidentally, and took to the role of publicist quite naturally; I’ve been doing it for 15 years. I’ve worked on campaigns for everything from children’s books to adult trade; cookbooks to philosophy; literary fiction to self-help—and I’ll tell you, as I’ve told everyone who has ever worked for me and with me, making a book is a long, difficult process. Nonetheless, when there’s blame about how the final product fares in the market, it often seems to fall on the publicist. Why?

Why would an author take his frustrations out on the person most directly linked to the consumers in the promotional process? Why are the notions of what a publicist does so cloudy? And why, in an era where lack of publicity is repeatedly cited as a major reason books fail, are so many publicists with years of experience struggling to keep their jobs?

Blame it on the digital revolution. Blame it on the homogenized media culture.Blame it on whomever, or whatever, you choose. One problem, aside from the difficulty of getting good publicity for a book, is dealing with misunderstandings about what a publicist can reasonably do.

Right now there are still two overarching umbrellas that classify book publicity campaigns. There are the “big” books that are positioned and sold to the “big” traditional media, and there are all the other books which, well, aren’t sold to the “big” traditional media. And when I say this, I’m not saying all of the other books don’t warrant the same attention as the big books, or that they won’t get a national break, or that they are lesser in any way. I’m saying that, still, there are basically two tracks we think about, and that’s a problem.

That not every book will be right for the “big” media spots is one problem, but it’s a reality. Too often, though, there seems to be anger about not getting those “big” spots instead of an open admission that there are lots of great press hits to be had on smaller outlets and in nontraditional ways.

There are hundreds of television, print, and radio venues, just like the old days. But now there is the Web and there’s social media. You can do viral campaigns. You can give away content in the form of actual books on blogs, or digitally in chapters on any and all Web sites.Can you, the publicist, work with online marketing to coordinate a campaign using some of these tools? Yes. Do you need to know even more people than ever before, collecting contacts like a paper clip magnet? Yes. Will you be able to do this for every book on your list? Probably not. But it would help if these “nontraditional” campaigns stopped being tagged as such. Book publicity is no longer about organizing a “big” or “small” campaign, and publicists know this, but the rest of the industry does not seem to have quite caught up.

So if you are a book publicist like me and one of your more irascible authors is quoted in New York magazine basically saying that publicists are worthless, close your eyes, count to 10, and remember that you have the power and the skill set to go out there and brave a new frontier of media. You will do things that haven’t been done before, and while you accept the well-deserved pat on the back that so rarely comes your way, you can take comfort in the fact that others are quietly saying, “How did she do that?”

(This article was originally published in Publishers Weekly titled “Do You Know What a Book Publicist Does?” and online here.)

When promoting a book is also about selling a new idea…

Is it an idea, a book or both?  I have this conversation with authors and publishers all the time.  It is one thing to pitch a mystery novel or a book on weight loss.  It is an entirely different approach if what you want to sell is a new concept or a new spin on something we all know.  Let’s break it down with one of the more difficult “idea” categories using some of my favorite tools when I was an economics major in college.

Eraser Clip Art

Faux Title Study I: Dominating the Widget Market for Investors

Let’s say you are publicizing a book about investing in the widget market.  Your book describes the market, it’s history, sample strategies, tips, potential outcomes, etc.  It is a prescriptive book that can help people make money from widgets, and in general help them learn more about the stock market.

You would likely employ a strategy that included a “top ten strategies/tips” list, soliciting radio interviews, pitching long lead magazines and soft financial publications for the average investor, trying to get on a morning TV show or other talk show that features self-improvement topics, getting involved in social media networks about making money in the market, and more.

With this book you have a clear direction, clear advice you can impart, and a community online and involved in traditional media that is always interested in how to be better off financially.  Now let’s look at the other side of the coin.

Faux Title Study 2: Dominating the Widget Market in a Changing World

This book is similar to the first in that the author talks about the market and history of the widget industry.  He will also probably share some case studies of investors both successful and unsuccessful as a way of illustrating the changes.  Theories of the future of widgets and why things are or are not improving will be in the book.  The conclusion may be more gray than black/white and the author will present a picture of what things are going to look like and perhaps ways we might adjust to allow for a more (or less) volatile environment.

I’m sure you are getting where I am going with this.  Title 1 is a clearer “how-to” offering whereas Title 2 is based on a hypothesis and theory based on research and/or data.  There may be some takeaways in terms of what one might do, but it will be implied rather than described in a list of “tips”.

Clearly these are simplistic examples, but I run into this all the time.  The thing is, we almost always want to try to promote the theory the same way we would promote the prescriptive, and it just doesn’t work.  First of all, authors who are writing about theory usually have a combination of academic and applied credentials and they generally don’t want to give people “advice”.  The kind of interview where “tips” are the goal is often awkward for this kind of person.

The other author loves giving workshops and presentations about how to do things better. For her topic, how we got here isn’t as important as what we are going to do about it.

In an ideal world it might be nice to have the two books and two authors to promote at the same time.  It would make for a fascinating discussion and we would all come away from it with a way to make things better.

 

Why won’t presidential candidates answer direct questions?

Hello, and welcome to my first official blog post on our firm’s brand new website.  So the topic of the day is the debate of course, having glued myself to the television for nearly two hours last night.  My anticipation of the conversation between the candidates falls in the category of “doing the same thing over again, but expecting different results”.  Did I get any answers?  No.  Should I have expected any?  Heck no.

Falling back on my years in public relations and talent management I can tell you there are very clear reasons why we don’t learn anything when a president speaks…I mean not since JFK or Roosevelt or Eisenhower.

First of all, the number of ways what we say can be broadcast around the world is unbelievable.  So being extra diligent about our words is critical, especially when we are promoting a product, handling a crisis, or trying to win an election.  You can’t take it back, and not only that, if you say something someone out there deems offensive or damaging, it will repeat itself in various forms and characters ad infinitum.  Not fun.

Then there is the idea of messaging.  When a public speaker is trained for the media, he is grilled over and over again on question/response protocol.  Body language, phrasing, tonality, all combine with the words themselves.  It’s really like theater in a way.  And if you saw what one newscaster in New York called two figures “circling each other in a cage”, you can appreciate the flair for the dramatic in a town hall setting.  No podium, just wide open stage.

Simply put, these televised productions are opportunities for the candidates to “show” us what they might be like.  Do we actually think Obama is going to admit that there was evidence predicting an act of terror in Libya and that the State Department openly ignored it?  Do we think Romney is going to cop to flip-flopping on his policies vis a vis governing Massachusetts and his campaign?

Fortunately I’ve already been deemed unnecessary by the two campagins because I live in a state that is already “decided”.  So I can sit back and watch, hoping for something that by the very nature of the promotional culture we have all embraced, will never come.

 

 

The first day…

This is my first day of blogging, but I think it’s time to start contributing to the conversation about the media world, entrepreneurship, and other subjects as they come to mind.

For the past fifteen years I have worked as a publicist in the publishing industry and most recently I have been developing and growing my own public relations agency, which focuses on building brands and platforms for books, authors, educational programs, websites, and other intellectual properties.  Here are ten things I’ve learned about public relations and publicity in fifteen years:

1. Much of what you see on television, hear on the radio, or read in the paper or online was originated by a pr person or advertiser.

2. As per above, if you think lawyers and politicians are dangerous, think about the minds behind the movements. Continue reading “The first day…”